Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Biomaterials Applications
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0885328208088863v1
23/3/263    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Percq, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, J.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Percq, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, J.W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Water Transport in Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Dental Cement

Audrey Percq1, Denis Dubois1, and J.W. Nicholson2*

1 Department of Chemistry, IUT Bethune, University of Artois 1230 rue de l’Université, 62408 Bethune, France
2 Biomaterials Chemistry Group, School of Science, University of Greenwich Medway Campus, Chatham, Kent, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Water uptake and water loss have been studied in a commercial resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, Fuji II LC, under a variety of conditions. Uptake was generally non-Fickian, but affected by temperature. At room temperature, the equilibrium water uptake values varied from 2.47 to 2.78% whereas at low temperature (12°C), it varied from 0.85 to 1.18%. Cure time affected uptake values significantly. Water uptake was much lower than in conventional glass-ionomer restorative cements exposed to water vapor. Loss of water under desiccating conditions was found to be Fickian for the first 5 h loss at both 22 and 12°C. Diffusion coefficients were between 0.45 and 0.76 x 10-7 cm2/s, with low temperature diffusion coefficients slightly greater than those at room temperature. Plotting water loss as percentage versus s-1/2 allowed activation energies to be determined from the Arrhenius equation and these were found to be 65.6, 79.8, and 7.7 kJ/mol respectively for 30, 20, and 10 s cure times. The overall conclusion is that the main advantage of incorporating HEMA into resin-modified-glass-ionomers is to alter water loss behavior. Rate of water loss and total amount lost are both reduced. Hence, resin-modified glass-ionomers are less sensitive to water loss than conventional glass-ionomers.

Key Words: resin-modified glass-ionomer, water sorption, water loss, kinetics.

First published on July 30, 2008, doi:10.1177/0885328208088863

Journal of Biomaterials Applications 2008;23:263.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?