This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bowlin, G. L. Articles by Rittgers, S. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bowlin, G. L. Articles by Rittgers, S. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Persistence of Electrostatically Seeded Endothelial Cells Lining a Small Diameter Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Vascular Graft

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980694, Richmond, VA 23298-0694glbowlin{at}saturn.vcu.edu

Andrew Meyer

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980694, Richmond, VA 23298-0694

Charles Fields

Anthony Cassano

Raymond G. Makhoul

Department of Surgery/Division of Vascular Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980108, Richmond, VA 23298-0108

Cynthia Allen

Department of Surgery/Cardiac Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980532, Richmond, VA 23298-0532

Stanley E. Rittgers

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325-0302

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the persistence of electrostatically seeded endothelial cells (ECs) lining an expanded polytetrafluorethylene (e-PTFE) graft after one week exposure to in vivo circulation in a canine femoral artery bypass model. This was accomplished by visualizing the PKH 26 (red fluorescent) label placed in the EC membranes prior to the seeding procedure. Furthermore, this study was performed to confirm that thesourceof the ECs lining thegraft werethosefrom theinitial inoculum.

Methods: This evaluation consisted of harvesting autologous, canine jugular vein ECs, PKH 26 labeling of the ECs, electrostatic EC seeding the e-PTFE grafts (4 mm GORE-TEX®, Length = 6 cm), implanting thegrafts (femoral artery model) for one week, and explanting the grafts for light, fluorescent and scanning electron microscopy evaluations of the luminal surface.

Results: The unseeded grafts (controls) had a mean fluorescence surface coverage of 6.82 ± 7.19%, while the EC seeded grafts had a mean of 90.3 ± 14.3% which is significantly (p<0.001) different from the controls. Overall, the seeding timeincluding the EC harvesting and PKH 26 labeling protocol was approximately 75 min.

Conclusions: The electrostatically seeded ECs persisted after implantation of the graft as demonstrated by the PKH 26 labeling data. The fluorescent data also demonstrated that the neointima formed (EC luminal surface coverage) one week after implantation was in fact derived from the ECs initially seeded as determined by the abundance of the labeled ECs.

Journal of Biomaterials Applications, Vol. 16, No. 2, 157-173 (2001)
DOI: 10.1106/NCQT-JFV9-2EQ1-EBGU


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?